Putting on a smile in times of pain; we are all guilty of it.
Mead
tells us that as social beings we learn to cultivate and understand our identities
in relationship to others. Social media gives us the power to curate our any
identity in just a few snaps, taps and clicks. Before you know it, you begin to
act in a certain way online to fulfill a facade identity. What happens when
your reality doesn’t align with who people expect you to be?
Media Accounting
In Lee Humphrey’s book The
Qualified Self: Social Media and the Accounting of Everyday Life, she explores the idea of social
media accounting as a historically ritualistic process through socio-technical
systems. In the 19th century, the diary was a daily, family documentation
of mundane and eventful activities. This documentation of birthdays, holidays, anniversaries
or moments of transition are annual practices of media accounting. The act of documenting
builds media traces of our past life’s experiences. Media traces provide us
with a physical form of remembrance.
Sound familiar?
In many ways, posting on social media is much like writing in
a diary. Interestingly, diaries weren’t always considered to be a private act of
daily reflection. In wasn’t until the 20th century, when American
culture shifted to an individualist nature, that diaries were locked up and held
hostage behind teenager’s doors.
They had often been read out loud as an act of facilitating domestic
conversation and connection. Families addressed any physical or emotional
concerns with transparency.
Can you imagine all your secrets being revealed at the
dinner table?
Media accounting was originally public and
transitioned into a private practice. With the innovation of socio-technology,
media accounting has transitioned back into the public view. However, rather
than being a healthy form of connection, there is a lack of conversation on
addressing real issues and personal struggles. With the absence of addressing these
issues, people further suppress their struggles by designing the 'perfect life' through their media traces and performing unaligned identities.
Performing Perfectionism
Business Insider met with Psychotherapist
Allison Abrams, she explains that it is in our innate nature to compare
ourselves to each other but social media amplifies our tendency to do so. A
vast majority of people choose to display the most perfect and aesthetically pleasing
moments of their life. To many viewers, this is interpreted as a constant
reiteration of how their life isn’t living up to these perfect standards.
The performance of positivity and perfection is reinforced for
a monetary value in the form of money or in the form of likes. Influencers are
often contracted with companies to promote and/or review products. They put on this
face to appropriately represent other identities to make money but end up
neglecting their own. Anna’s Analysis of Fake Positivity
explains it nicely:
Often,
these influencers are dealing with their own emotional problems that they may
feel like they can’t talk about because it would affect their reputation and
how people view their advice. Or they may feel like people wouldn’t be as
attracted to their content if they weren’t always upbeat and bubbly.
As mentioned before, we tend to understand our own identity
in relation to others. It is much easier put on a smile in fear of rejection or
scrutiny. It is much easier to blend in to fulfill the shoes of what others
expect of you, especially when your income and quality of living depends on it.
Digital Panopticon
This phenomenon that we must post the best representation of
ourselves is so deeply ideologized into a conformative cycle of perfectionism. We
can understand this in relation to Foucault’s Panopticon. The Panopticon is an architectural
structure designed to reinforce self-discipline and social order through the
imagined, constant surveillance of authority. In other words, he proves that people
tend to conform to the expected behavior when they think they are being watched
by others. This is an accurate explanation for why we conform to the perfection
performed by others.
We see this problem most prevalent in Instagram and YouTube
influences. Their ‘come-up timeline’ always starts with them bringing something
unique to the table that is relatable or at least interesting. Whether that be
their personality, authenticity or niche, it jumps starts their following and
fame.
Surprise… being unique is good and this is what viewers want.
When they finally make it, many start to blend into the scene.
This comes in fear of losing the social status they have spent so much time
curating online. And all of a sudden, they ‘aren’t relatable’ or ‘authentic’
anymore.
Life Update
This is incredibly painful to feel unaligned with an
identity you’re meant to keep playing. YouTuber and Influencer Daisy Marquez is
only one example of the unspoken reality within the industry. On Twitter, on
November 4, 2019, she posted:
Comments of support flooded her feed, but nothing was addressed
further than this snippet of her personal struggles. Daisy posted this eleven days
before she posted her "life
update.." video. That’s a long time to be sitting with these dark emotions
and that’s only a fraction of the time frame. In this video she confesses how depressed
she has been behind closed doors.
It was so bad to the point that her hair was falling out…literally,
she shows a bald spot.
Daisy admits that she’s been struggling with depression and anxiety
for months and nobody has known because she keeps a smile on her face and goes
through the motions of keeping up with her social media identity. To separate herself
from her ‘LA’ identity she announces that she has made the decision to move
back to Texas “to find her roots”.
While venting to the camera she discovers that the reason
she feels like a “failure” is because she has “succeeded in everything [she]
has wanted in life but [she hasn’t] succeeded at being happy”.
This is the sad truth of today’s social media culture.
In the eyes of the digital panopticon, influencers feel the
need to live up to an unrealistic standard of a ‘perfect life’. When the truth
is, everyone has hard times. Life isn’t always margaritas on the beach, photoshoots
and People’s Choice Awards. Perfectionism is only a constructed design. As a
society transitioning from the private to public means of media accounting, we
haven’t adapted to displaying authentic representations of our lives.
The problem with performing perfectionism is that it only
fulfills a surface level identity. Yeah you're smiling in that picture but
how were you feeling behind the lens? That’s what matters.
No comments:
Post a Comment